(August 16, 2016 at 1:24 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(August 16, 2016 at 1:18 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Why oh why would they die for a lie?Aaaand, now we're back to Steve lowering his standards for, and playing the semantics game with words like "evidence", "proof", and "cause and effect" as a means of lubing up his precious NT before shoving it directly into our asses.
Stop, I told you I wasn't going to humor this. If you want me to consider your assertions to be true, make them so.
If you don't what to hear me mention the NT, then you shouldn't claim there is no evidence for God as a rebuttal to...well...just about anything. In fact there is evidence. The most an atheist can justify saying is that the evidence is not compelling--moving from positively asserting a fact "no evidence" (and not being able to defend it) to the much modest claim of "not compelling". Perhaps I underestimate all of your ability to grasp that distinction.