The real religion?

[Crossless2.0]

I mean, I could say that Jesus coming back to life violates everything we know about biology, chemistry, and physics, but he'd simply wave that away with a "Well, he is the son of god."  Which is hilarious, really.

Ditto with walking on water, turning water into wine, healing people (pretty amazing before germ theory), predicting various things (like Peter refusing him three times), etc.

So...you don't think there is evidence for God, miracles would be obvious evidence for God, the NT is not true because it contains miracles. That is a very good example of circular reasoning. Congrats.

And it's because we both are willing to believe that everything we 'know' about the way the world operates can be suspended on hearsay based on the say-so of clearly self-interested, alleged witnesses that we have both embraced the Good News of Apollonius of Tyana, right Steve? Right?!?

Or is this where you (a) indulge in special pleading or (b) an appeal to popularity.