RE: The real religion?
August 16, 2016 at 3:29 pm
(This post was last modified: August 16, 2016 at 3:30 pm by Jesster.)
(August 16, 2016 at 3:27 pm)SteveII Wrote:(August 16, 2016 at 3:15 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Reporting on supposed eyewitness accounts =/= eyewitness accounts...
I wrote my sentence poorly. Peter, James and John = eyewitnesses.
Luke was kind of a reporter who interviewed eyewitnesses for Luke and Acts.
Paul knew some of the apostles and referred to them (so not an eyewitness but confirmed his belief that the apostles and others were eyewitnesses).
Peter, James, and John were not eyewitnesses. People wrote about that second hand too.
Luke and Paul just got second hand-claims. That's not evidence.
I don't believe you. Get over it.