RE: The real religion?
August 16, 2016 at 10:43 pm
(This post was last modified: August 16, 2016 at 10:43 pm by GrandizerII.)
(August 16, 2016 at 10:37 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(August 16, 2016 at 10:15 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: If results from a scientific study cannot be reproduced, then there was a problem with the original study design, problem with data interpretation/extrapolation, or a problem with the hypothesis. This is not a hit against science itself as you are implying. That is the beauty of the scientific method: it is a self-correcting process. Christians have no such process. If they did, their book would implode.
I don't think that it is a hit against science... I like science; I just don't think that it is the be all, end all of all truth. Also I disagree with your claim that Christians have no such process. Much like science, we can't change the data, but we can reassess our understanding of it, it's called theology.
Too bad that "data" doesn't get rigorously tested in theology, just presumed as true.