RE: The real religion?
August 16, 2016 at 10:58 pm
(This post was last modified: August 16, 2016 at 11:07 pm by RoadRunner79.)
(August 16, 2016 at 10:55 pm)Jesster Wrote:(August 16, 2016 at 10:52 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: What do you have in mind for rigorous testing in this context? Are you saying, that if I can't rigorously test something, then I should presume it to be false?
Shall we examine that with evolution?
Let me draw a line here really quickly. What you seem to be trying to do is refute scientific claims to prove that god is plausible.
That's not how this game works. God is only plausible once you show evidence for God. Entirely separate claims have nothing to do with that.
Stop spinning.
I'm not trying to refute any scientific claims here.... I think these are bad arguments and premises. Do you think they make good arguments against science? I don't, and I don't assume that because I haven't personally experienced something, that it is false.