(August 17, 2016 at 5:09 pm)SteveII Wrote:(August 17, 2016 at 4:21 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: This might help, #469: http://atheistforums.org/thread-44065-page-47.html
Show me how any of my arguments for the NT could be applied to the gnostic or other "gospels".
I'm not a NT or other gospel scholar. Just saying, they were written around the same time, in the same manor (second hand) about the same subject(s). Other than the NT gospels being canonized years later, how do they differ in origin? Couldn't all the arguments you've given for the NT gospels also be applied for the acceptance/belief for the other gospels?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
