The real religion?

[RoadRunner79]

From your comments in parenthesis I would say that you are still going with testimony in unreliable.   So then the only reasonable option would be 1.  That neither scripture or science  testimony provide sufficient evidence or reason to believe.  I do grant that we accept things without sufficient evidence, but I don't think that it is unreasonable for others to not do the same.

You just want to believe in Christianity. That's fine. Just don't think you're going to convince any of us with such poor reasoning that your beliefs are at the same level as acceptance of scientific facts in terms of strength and quantity of evidence.

I can speak for myself thank you. And I wouldn't make such a broad generalization. In both there are varying degrees of strength and weakness for individual claims.