(August 19, 2016 at 4:38 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(August 19, 2016 at 2:46 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: From your comments in parenthesis I would say that you are still going with testimony in unreliable. So then the only reasonable option would be 1. That neither scripture or science testimony provide sufficient evidence or reason to believe. I do grant that we accept things without sufficient evidence, but I don't think that it is unreasonable for others to not do the same.-snipped for brevity
Well, at least you tried, Camus. Apparently, if the gospels aren't true.....then RR, and all of humanity.... is a know-nothing and just peachy on that count in spite of it.
That's your standard theistic scorched earth policy in action, why do you humor this asshattery, have you learned your lesson?
Not a chance. The rock has simply rolled back down the incline. LFC will catch her breath, wipe her brow, and start pushing the damn thing again. It's her Sisyphean fate to engage the Christian rock, no matter how hopeless and meaningless the task may be.
Now, if she had been LadyForHume, she could take a break once in a while, have a cold stiff drink, and enjoy a game of billiards.