The real religion?

[RoadRunner79]

From your comments in parenthesis I would say that you are still going with testimony in unreliable.   So then the only reasonable option would be 1.  That neither scripture or science  testimony provide sufficient evidence or reason to believe.  I do grant that we accept things without sufficient evidence, but I don't think that it is unreasonable for others to not do the same.

-snipped for brevity

Well, at least you tried, Camus.  Apparently, if the gospels aren't true.....then RR, and all of humanity.... is a know-nothing and just peachy on that count in spite of it.   

That's your standard theistic scorched earth policy in action, why do you humor this asshattery, have you learned your lesson? 

I thought it was in there, but went back, and found it was not. But what I was referring to is that any science that is not from first hand experience, but is knowledge based on what others observed. Witnesses are unreliable right?