(August 19, 2016 at 4:38 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(August 19, 2016 at 2:46 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: From your comments in parenthesis I would say that you are still going with testimony in unreliable. So then the only reasonable option would be 1. That neither scripture or science testimony provide sufficient evidence or reason to believe. I do grant that we accept things without sufficient evidence, but I don't think that it is unreasonable for others to not do the same.-snipped for brevity
Well, at least you tried, Camus. Apparently, if the gospels aren't true.....then RR, and all of humanity.... is a know-nothing and just peachy on that count in spite of it.
That's your standard theistic scorched earth policy in action, why do you humor this asshattery, have you learned your lesson?
Lol, omg, Rhythm. I've been around these parts for almost a year now (which I know isn't a very long time compared to some of you), but stuff like this still shocks me. I can see how the veteran members get burn out after years and years. I wonder why it is that some people can come to the understanding on their own, and others...you can hit them over the head with it endlessly to no avail...[emoji848]
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
