The real religion?

[RoadRunner79]

You asked me for concerning the above, and as I had stated, I was answering still under the assumption (from the comments enclosed in parenthesis in your questions) that testimony was still de facto insufficient evidence in consideration. The question was different in you asked what I thought was reasonable.

And your answer as to which position would be reasonable will depend on whether you consider testimony sufficient evidence or not, lol. This isn't that hard, RR. You have to be fucking with me.

As to your different questions here-

It's the same damn question and you know it. I was trying to give you one last opportunity to clarify your POV, which you seem pretty intent on NOT doing.

It is better to work from solid principles, and then apply them to the specifics, not the other way around.

Nah, I'd say it's better to stop wasting my time with an intellectually dishonest person who has no intention of committing to any point at all; who prefers to draw endless, illogical mazes leading to nowhere. [emoji849]

Remember, lying for Jesus is still lying! [emoji57]

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

That is about how I figured that would go....ignore my answer, make up your own, and then insult. No real discussion or critical thinking......