You just summed up what I believe.
In the end it works out to be a question of: are you an agnostic atheist or a gnostic atheist?
However, I think the agnostic atheist is the more sensible and reasonable position. To be a gnostic atheist requires the assertion that god is 100% non-existent, which like EvF said, is a fallacy. To be a gnostic atheist requires faith, that is, a belief that you can know something certainly without the observable proof, which would put you in the same camp as a christian.
Which are you?
In the end it works out to be a question of: are you an agnostic atheist or a gnostic atheist?
However, I think the agnostic atheist is the more sensible and reasonable position. To be a gnostic atheist requires the assertion that god is 100% non-existent, which like EvF said, is a fallacy. To be a gnostic atheist requires faith, that is, a belief that you can know something certainly without the observable proof, which would put you in the same camp as a christian.
Which are you?
"I think that God in creating Man somewhat overestimated his ability." Oscar Wilde
My Blog | Why I Don't Believe in God
My Blog | Why I Don't Believe in God
