RE: What if Creationists were Athiest for a day?
August 28, 2016 at 3:11 pm
(This post was last modified: August 28, 2016 at 3:59 pm by Arkilogue.)
(August 28, 2016 at 2:43 pm)ScienceAf Wrote:(August 28, 2016 at 2:31 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: Because it's unnecessary. The inherent order and unfolding process is perfect.
So the universe would be clockwork?
It doesn't need a god.
If it needs one to unfold it...
How do we know?
Biological, like an embryo, developing in the womb.
(August 28, 2016 at 2:46 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(August 28, 2016 at 2:31 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: Because it's unnecessary. The inherent order and unfolding process is perfect.
Only in your fevered imagination. This 'unfolding' of yours is nothing but impressionistic bullshit.
How would you describe the colors coming from white light?
How would you describe the 4 fundamental forces coming from a unified state?
Has any other scientific fields used "folded/unfolded" in similar application?
http://science.howstuffworks.com/science...theory.htm
Superstring theories take this idea and build the entire universe from the bottom up. And yes, it's as challenging a task as it sounds. That's why we speak of string theories in the plural, because there are several different string theories that attempt to make it all work. Oh, and at least 10 dimensions are called for, too, just for all the math involved. Physicists propose that any dimensions beyond time and visible space are folded up and out of sight.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder