RE: What if Creationists were Athiest for a day?
August 29, 2016 at 1:33 pm
(This post was last modified: August 29, 2016 at 1:37 pm by Angrboda.)
(August 28, 2016 at 5:38 pm)Arkilogue Wrote:(August 28, 2016 at 5:03 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Like I said: impressionistic bullshit.Take it up with the astrophysicists.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.2219
Cosmological Origami: Properties of Cosmic-Web Components when a Non-Stretchy Dark-Matter Sheet Folds
Mark C. Neyrinck (JHU)
(Submitted on 10 Aug 2014 (v1), last revised 16 Jun 2015 (this version, v5))
In the current cosmological paradigm, an initially flat three-dimensional manifold that pervades space (the `dark-matter sheet') folds up to build concentrations of mass (galaxies), and a cosmic web between them. Galaxies are nodes, connected by a network of filaments and walls. The folding is in six-dimensional (3D position, plus 3D velocity) phase space. The positions of creases, or caustics, mark the edges of structures.
Here, I introduce an origami approximation to cosmological structure formation, in which the dark-matter sheet is not allowed to stretch. But it still produces an idealized cosmic web, with nodes, filaments, walls and voids. In 2D, nodes form in `polygonal collapse' (a twist-fold in origami), necessarily generating filaments simultaneously. In 3D, nodes form in `polyhedral collapse,' simultaneously generating filaments and walls. The masses, spatial arrangement, and angular momenta of nodes and filaments are related in the model. I describe some `tetrahedral collapse', or tetrahedral twist-fold, models.
Any relationship to the way I've been describing the same thing is purely coincidental.
"Proceedings of the 6th International Meeting on Origami in Science, Mathematics, and Education."
You do know what a phase space is, don't you?