I am staying on topic. I didn't troll or flame anyone excessively. I did nothing wrong so far. I presented my arguments as to why no one should feel ashamed to consume a public figure's intellectual output, no matter the figure or the output. One could argue against such a figure's views, but one shouldn't argue against one's preference for such figures. That's indefensible, I think.
If anyone thinks I broke any rules or anything like that, they're welcome to alert staff to it, but I do not appreciate being silenced in this manner.
If anyone thinks I broke any rules or anything like that, they're welcome to alert staff to it, but I do not appreciate being silenced in this manner.