Why can't Christians Verify Exactly Where Jesus Was Buried?

[Minimalist]

Here's another discussion on this horseshit.  I imagine this fellow is a "quack," too.... since that seems to be the extent of the jesus freaks' ability to defend their position.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/postevery...558f39f9d0

Did historical Jesus really exist? The evidence just doesn’t add up.

So what do the mainstream (and non-Christian) scholars say about all this? Surprisingly very little – of substance anyway. Only Bart Ehrman and Maurice Casey have thoroughly attempted to prove Jesus’ historical existence in recent times. Their most decisive point? The Gospels can generally be trusted – after we ignore the many, many bits that are untrustworthy – because of the hypothetical (i.e. non-existent) sources behind them. Who produced these hypothetical sources? When? What did they say? Were they reliable? Were they intended to be accurate historical portrayals, enlightening allegories, or entertaining fictions?

Ehrman and Casey can’t tell you – and neither can any New Testament scholar. Given the poor state of the existing sources, and the atrocious methods used by mainstream Biblical historians, the matter will likely never be resolved. In sum, there are clearly good reasons to doubt Jesus’ historical existence – if not to think it outright improbable.

C'mon Danny.  Give us a couple of good quacks.