(September 6, 2016 at 3:53 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(September 6, 2016 at 1:23 pm)JuliaL Wrote:
Sure she's a crook.
But he's a nut.
No, Nixon was a crook, Reagan was a crook. At best Hillary is a jaywalker. Now, again, I really don't want to hear shit about her because the same bullshit scare tactics were aimed at Obama for the past 8 years. And even prior to that the GOP has sold the same cold war bullshit slurs about all of the left on every issue. As a party, as voters, we are still on the right side of history. The parties flipped since the 60s and the GOP has been wrong ever since.
No, she's a crook.
![[Image: ?url=%2Fcmsmedia%2F79%2F1d%2F1f2c6c2942a...raphic.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.usnews.com%2Fdims4%2FUSNEWS%2F6295bc2%2F2147483647%2Fresize%2F970x%2Fquality%2F85%2F%3Furl%3D%252Fcmsmedia%252F79%252F1d%252F1f2c6c2942a6b97f643ca95f0d32%252F160422data-hillaryfees1-graphic.png)
I don't care if you call it grift, graft, fraud or corruption, but there is nothing she could say in an hour's speech that would be worth thirteen years (of one shift) minimum wage labor.
Just because you can't see the quid pro quo with enough detail to sustain a prosecution, doesn't mean it isn't there.
Our (corrupt) system faces us with a limited selection of candidates so we're stuck with a choice between a crook and a nut. At least the crook shows self interest which is important in a world with MAD.
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat?
