Question's for God.

[Angrboda]

When people during their NDE see doctors and nurses from above working on their dead bodies and later on when their body is revived describe what the doctors and nurses did with all particulars that is super evidence.

I took it upon myself to do a little research on Pam Reynolds' case.

1.  She was intubated for a considerable time after regaining consciousness, and did not begin to relate her experience for some time after that.

2.  Her surgical team discussed/described the procedure to her before the surgery.

3.  When she regained consciousness (remember - still intubated and so could not speak), her surgeon reviewed the surgery with her again.

4.  More than one anesthesiologist has reviewed the case and concluded that her experience was something called 'anesthesia awareness', which, while not exactly commonplace, isn't frightfully rare, either.

While I don't doubt Ms. Reynolds' sincerity (meaning I don't think she was deliberately lying), I don't really see the need for a non-prosaic explanation of what happened to her.

Boru

No, that is weak evidence.

How could a dead body-brain witness what doctors-nurse were doing?

That's a legitimate question.  Unfortunately for you it's already been answered by the question of when the NDEs occurred.  You keep blurring one case into another as if they all had the features of the specific ones.  Your picture of NDEs and thus your conclusion end up being non-representative.

Yes, the evidence is there.
Once the evidence for the NDEs is there and it is there as explained above then all other pieces of the puzzle are there.
Most of these people who had the NDE experience are asked to go back into their bodies for the simple reason that they haven't learned the lesson yet.
That means that the karma law demand that these people must yet to deal with actions and reactions.
And again it is obvious that if the karma exist also the reincarnation exist.
If you only would use your brain you would have already understood how the system works but instead you refuse to let it go because that would destroy your atheism that you try to cling on at all cost.

The bolded part is an inference for which you have no direct evidence.  Why doesn't it mean that they are not ready to be judged for heaven and hell?  Only your religious bullshit says that it means karma.  It could mean nothing at all.  And again in the blue, you pile inference upon inference.  Religious dogma piled on religious dogma.  That's not evidence, that's just assertions.  So why doesn't this 'mean' that there is a literal heaven and hell instead?

Fool.  

You don't even know what happen under the influence of drugs and yet you keep on speculating with no end in sight.
You keep on throwing judgment after judgment and then you say that you don't have to have the burden of proof.
You got to be nut yog.
Drugs act on the higher glands especially on the pineal gland which is the border between the physical reality and the spiritual reality.
By entering by force in the spiritual reality is possible to enjoy a form of distorted spirituality in which you can feel quite good but that lead to addiction and damage body-brain.  

This is another of your red herrings.  Instead of demonstrating the reality of these 'spiritual' experiences, you babble on with bare assertions about how drugs work.  You don't know.  You're just repeating religiously based dogma about the effect of drugs.  It has absolutely squat to do with demonstrating that these experiences are a part of reality.  It's just guessing and more bare assertions.  The point is you haven't demonstrated the reality of your spiritual dimensions, no matter what you blabber about the pineal gland.

Double fool.      

Religious based dogmas?
Since when religions connect drugs with the pineal gland?
Do some researches yog and see how drugs works on the pineal gland.
I can't give you the pacifier every time you start blubbering.  

Cute.  I tell you you're off-topic, so you respond by going more off-topic.  Speaking of blubbering.  Nice pre-emptive strike telling me you're not going to give any evidence of your assertions about the pineal gland.  You might as well have just said, "I can't, so I give up."

It is very bizarre how so many atheists don't get it.  
Those who smoke, drink or use some drugs search the God that they deny.
God is peace of mind.
God is happiness.
The above substances give just that.
Drugs give the God that they deny it exist.
How stupid is that?  

Blah, blah, blah.  More bare assertions and nary a bit of evidence.

Not at all yog.

I do not expect that everybody come to the conclusion that God is real as per magic.
Atheists and anyone who doesn't care about God sooner or later will have to wake up to this reality.
Every single action that people do is done in order to evolve or get out the physical-mental sewer.
That means getting closer and closer to God whether we realize it or not.
The search for peace of mind and total bliss lead only in one place and that is where God is.
You never thought about that yog, did you?  

The search for peace of mind and total bliss is a fool's errand.  They don't exist.  See?  I can make bare assertions too.  Now don't make me give you the pacifier and explain why.