RE: Controversial views
September 18, 2016 at 5:45 am
(This post was last modified: September 18, 2016 at 5:46 am by Edwardo Piet.)
I guess one of my most controversial viewpoints is that I'd ultimately take harmless inequality over harmful equality any day. Obviously the thing is equality almost always is more harmless and less harmful.
I guess just saying at the end of the day I value complementariness over "fairness"... because I think it's more fair. Lol, equivocation, I know. Guess thing is fairness is not the same as sameness:
That basically (my italics).
I guess just saying at the end of the day I value complementariness over "fairness"... because I think it's more fair. Lol, equivocation, I know. Guess thing is fairness is not the same as sameness:
Steven Pinker Wrote:Another political fear of human nature is that if we are blank slates, we can perfect mankind -- the age-old dream of the perfectibility of our species through social engineering. Whereas, if we're born with certain instincts, then perhaps some of them might condemn us to selfishness, prejudice and violence. Well, in the book, I argue that these are, in fact, non sequiturs. And just to make a long story short: first of all, the concept of fairness is not the same as the concept of sameness. And so when Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal," he did not mean "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are clones." Rather, that all men are equal in terms of their rights, and that every person ought to be treated as an individual, and not prejudged by the statistics of particular groups that they may belong to. Also, even if we were born with certain ignoble motives, they don't automatically lead to ignoble behavior. That is because the human mind is a complex system with many parts, and some of them can inhibit others. For example, there's excellent reason to believe that virtually all humans are born with a moral sense, and that we have cognitive abilities that allow us to profit from the lessons of history. So even if people did have impulses towards selfishness or greed, that's not the only thing in the skull, and there are other parts of the mind that can counteract them.
That basically (my italics).