Foundation of all Axioms the Axioms of Consciousness

[The Grand Nudger]

Any memory that enters the conscious experience needs to become one of the activities inside a globe in the above argument and as such is covered in that analysis.

The analysis was poor to begin with, why would returning to it yield better results this time?  I asked you if you were familiar with a register, because it;s function is to hold data to be made available to other assemblies that may or may not be available or in synch with the registers input.  It holds an output until such time as it is required, or can be made use of.

“I” is the single thing that is observing the tree. What has been demonstrated is from instant to instant all of the activities (Nerve impulses etc) taken to be creating the conscious experience have absolutely no connection to each other.

Instant to instant?  If you stop time then time will stop.  Instant to instant a snapshot of a wheel never seems to turn..and yet, it turns.  

 This is as a nerve impulse must complete before it can influence some activity to its future.

Right, and if that nerve impulse "completes" before the data is useful or out of synch with some other "bubble" that it needs to be fed through, you need a register.  Thankfully, such things as registers exist and do work.

While the above argument does not use special relativity (SR), it is a fact (from SR) that simultaneous events cannot have a connection or create anything that has energy. The essential nature of “I” is that it must bring together simultaneous event that make up the “U” or the tree. There is nothing physical that can do that.

Except everything that has a register...like the pc you used to type that absurd claim with. Why do these thread always turn into "nothing physical can do this" or "materialism can;t account for that". Is that the sum total of your support for the statements made? If so, you're just flat out wrong..what else can be said?