The only possible good I see coming from this legislation is the hope that we can get sworn testimony into the public sphere about the deeper connections of the attack.
Not that I think that'll pan out ... an attorney will invoke "national security" and that will be that, unless there's a judge with some spine hearing the arguments.
Not that I think that'll pan out ... an attorney will invoke "national security" and that will be that, unless there's a judge with some spine hearing the arguments.