(October 10, 2016 at 12:11 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(October 10, 2016 at 12:01 am)theBorg Wrote: Thank, you, dear member of AF. Thank you for not using the insults or for not attacking me with the fu**-word, as they used to do in the Thinking Atheist Forum. I made the fatal mistake of revealing the whole my mind their. However, I was not banned, but got a lots of f-words.
The thread in AF begins with the strange title "Are the holy angels like the time-cops?" Let us study this "strangeness" first. The motive was to attract the public attention, so even the moderators do became interested, as it appears from the recent comments here.
Please, let us leave aside the question of the experimental detection of an angel. Then my own definition of the angel is "the living being, who is not an animal, not an insect, not a bird, etc thing from the school biology and virus-ology, and not a human."
Do you "copy" all this "nonsense"?
No. You've not defined what an angel even is. You've only said a few.things that it isn't.
And yes, you will need to produce evidence of their existence, too, if you wish to change my mind. You aren't exempt from the demands of rationality.
I see, we have stumbled right at the title. So, it is not surprising, what the thread is looking like the gibberish nonsense.
What could I do then? To pray for the AF?
