AW yes.... Gods love

[Timothy]

Regardless of how you're defining skepticism, your argument is that it is not a worthy way to interpret the bible because the bible says otherwise. That is circular.

The question isn't about interpreting the Bible, but examining its trustworthiness. Take for example the claims that the Bible makes about metaphysics, and someone who holds to metaphysical skepticism. It would be circular for that person to apply their belief that metaphysical skepticism is true to say "We cannot trust the claims the Bible makes about metaphysics, because metaphysical skepticism is true." That's because it assumes the falsity of the Biblical view that metaphysical knowledge is possible. It's just a simple example of the kind of circular reasoning that can occur. It also applies equally to the person wishing to defend the Bible, who might assume an Biblical epistemological principle in order to defend the Bible.