RE: Karma poll
October 13, 2016 at 11:37 am
(This post was last modified: October 13, 2016 at 11:42 am by Angrboda.)
(October 13, 2016 at 9:11 am)Little Rik Wrote:(October 13, 2016 at 8:59 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Because Buddhism doesn't require the belief in a god. You can be buddhist and atheist. Many are.
Wrong mate.
Buddha had a lot of intuition.
He knew that if he would preach God to ignorant masses his message would never be understood
so he opt for something different in order to get to the point anyway.
He taught yoga to these people.
Yoga is all about reducing the distance that separate us from God.
Buddha was a master of yoga.
He just used the best tactic available to him in order to reach the best result.
The first stages of yoga do not require an immediate believe in God but as soon as you advance in the practice you are bound to understand that a mighty force is waiting for you.
Most Buddhists have lost the understanding of what Buddha was teaching that is why Buddha deep spirituality was transformed into the religion that we got these days.
In other words Buddha original teaching have absolutely nothing to do with atheism.
And all this bullshit about what Buddha originally taught, as opposed to what he knew, is pulled straight from your ass.
You have no way of knowing any of this shit. You just made it up out of thin air. It's just another of your fanciful "just so" stories.
Wikipedia Wrote:In science and philosophy, a just-so story, also called an ad hoc fallacy, is an unverifiable and unfalsifiable narrative explanation for a cultural practice, a biological trait, or behavior of humans or other animals. The pejorative nature of the expression is an implicit criticism that reminds the hearer of the essentially fictional and unprovable nature of such an explanation. Such tales are common in folklore and mythology (where they are known as etiological myths—see etiology).