"Some of the most widely held views about sexual orientation, such as the “born that way” hypothesis, simply are not supported by science." Is that why homosexuality is ubiquitous throughout nature? Idk why I even try to argue with religious fuck tards. You find one way to construe something, and they find a million other ways to try to take what you say and act like you're wrong because it doesn't fit their world view. Ohhhhhh but what if that's what I'm doing? Yeah in that case better just back up my bags and go off to straight camp, because I realize my days as a gay are numbered and I aught to just go straight because of course that's what Jesus wants. So much healthier that way.
and yes, that part that I quoted is from the article, I skimmed the conclusion of it, and I think that's bullshit. I didn't finish reading it, but when you find a piece of a writing that compromises the whole thing, I think it's safe to stop and just point that out. If your entire paper is predicated on bullshit like this, idk how you can take it seriously. That paper sure does make a big stink about sounding like it's concerned with scientific accuracy though. Hmmmm we should really investigate these gays, because there could be something wrong with them mentally. Hmmmm. Kiss my ass.
and yes, that part that I quoted is from the article, I skimmed the conclusion of it, and I think that's bullshit. I didn't finish reading it, but when you find a piece of a writing that compromises the whole thing, I think it's safe to stop and just point that out. If your entire paper is predicated on bullshit like this, idk how you can take it seriously. That paper sure does make a big stink about sounding like it's concerned with scientific accuracy though. Hmmmm we should really investigate these gays, because there could be something wrong with them mentally. Hmmmm. Kiss my ass.
