(October 25, 2016 at 9:48 pm)Jesster Wrote:(October 25, 2016 at 9:42 pm)FallentoReason Wrote: One doesn't have to be in a debate for one's ideas to be challenged (or lack of a challenge).
I'm just saying that it is not at all an ad hominem to use an insult in this manner.
If you want to dislike him for his tactics, I will grant you that. I am not really here to defend Dawkins. I'm just trying to clear up how this specific fallacy can be applied. It happens a lot with this one.
But it's very simple! Dawkins is trying to discredit the Judeo-Christian God. He does so via insults. This results in the fallacy of an ad hom.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle