(October 30, 2016 at 4:47 am)Rhythm Wrote: Who's not entertaining a different universe? We both agree that in a different universe, where things are different, things would be different.
I think "class of thing" is your dumpster phrase after having realized how idiotic your non-points have been thusfar. It means nothing, just an attempt to save face. You want the hypothetial god of goblygoop to be logical(this much is painfully obvious). Trouble is, it isn't and by definition could not be.
It's goblygoopal. What's the problem? Run with it. We have proposed, for our consideration, a hypothetical.... illogical god, that does illogical things, in hypothetical..illogical alternate universes.
You have no argument. You're positing that goblygoop is illogical, and that has as much weight as insisting you want to play texas hold 'em as opposed to any other rule. That isn't going to fly. This is my hypothetical where the alternate rules of another universe are just as coherent as the logical axioms that govern this universe.
Until you accept the hypothetical I'm afraid we can't move forward.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
