Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 24, 2025, 5:26 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science without Religion is lame
#30
RE: Science without Religion is lame
(June 6, 2011 at 12:10 pm)Castle Wrote: Yes, Einstein did quote that the most incomprehensible thing about Universe is the Universe is comprehensible.
I don't care if your source is Einstein, that was still a blatantly stupid thing of him to say, and look up appeal to authority. Opinions only matter if they are informed and stand up to scrutiny.

To this day there are still many major unsolved problems in physics, but never mind the cosmos, let's just take a gander at events in human history on this planet for one minute. For example: Who was really Jack the Ripper? Or what caused the 1975 Moorgate tube crash? There are many unknowns, lacking any sufficent evidence to provide a proper explanation or account, indeed as far as we know we may never be able to answer these questions.


Quote:Perhaps the unknowns, could also be called spiritual,
No. The unexplained is just that, the unexplained. Nothing more, nothing less. Redefining it as "spiritual" accomplishes nothing because like 'supernatural' it is a meaningless word, or rather, a word so abused by the masses daily it has ceased to have any relevance in any context.


(June 6, 2011 at 2:42 pm)Castle Wrote: Do you think the saying, I am no better or worst than the next man, comes in mind?
No. What we're saying is just because you're irreligious doesn't make you rational.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 5, 2011 at 10:31 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 5, 2011 at 11:24 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 1:03 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 1:06 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by jordi - June 6, 2011 at 2:07 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 2:10 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by jordi - June 6, 2011 at 2:28 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 2:48 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 3:16 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 11:36 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by orogenicman - June 6, 2011 at 4:21 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Darth - June 6, 2011 at 4:26 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 5:01 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Gawdzilla - June 6, 2011 at 6:49 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 12:10 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 11:45 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by DeistPaladin - June 6, 2011 at 11:57 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Gawdzilla - June 6, 2011 at 12:17 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 12:24 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 11:59 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by LastPoet - June 6, 2011 at 1:26 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 2:04 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 2:19 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 2:29 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Gawdzilla - June 6, 2011 at 4:28 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 2:12 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 2:42 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 4:47 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 4:53 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 5:38 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Welsh cake - June 6, 2011 at 3:29 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 4:26 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 5:07 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 5:54 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 11:09 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 7, 2011 at 2:22 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Anomalocaris - June 7, 2011 at 3:42 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Anomalocaris - June 6, 2011 at 8:17 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 7, 2011 at 2:06 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 3:30 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 4:09 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 8, 2011 at 1:02 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 7, 2011 at 4:42 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 8, 2011 at 12:47 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 8, 2011 at 3:32 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 9, 2011 at 1:14 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 11:04 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 8, 2011 at 12:22 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 8, 2011 at 1:14 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 8, 2011 at 1:38 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 8, 2011 at 5:19 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Darth - June 8, 2011 at 5:58 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Jax - June 8, 2011 at 6:59 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 9, 2011 at 4:24 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 8, 2011 at 8:53 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by tackattack - June 9, 2011 at 1:03 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by tackattack - June 9, 2011 at 5:17 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 9, 2011 at 6:09 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by tackattack - June 9, 2011 at 6:50 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 9, 2011 at 10:37 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 9, 2011 at 2:09 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? Whateverist 143 53366 March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Without the Shedding of Blood There is No Remission of Sin Rhondazvous 231 72566 June 4, 2017 at 9:31 am
Last Post: Zenith
  Little children who died without Baptism go to eternal Hell?! Jehanne 34 7744 February 29, 2016 at 6:22 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Why i choose science reason and atheism over religion dyresand 28 9039 December 29, 2015 at 5:43 pm
Last Post: dyresand
Exclamation Without God You will Fail! Gods Squad 110 21588 October 19, 2015 at 9:28 am
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  How to prove Christianity is right without trying very hard Dystopia 6 4180 July 15, 2015 at 5:01 am
Last Post: Excited Penguin
  How to Prove Your Own Position without Trying Very Hard Randy Carson 59 14034 July 14, 2015 at 10:27 pm
Last Post: Ravenshire
  Bad/Good Things That Happen Without the Aid of a Deity Nope 30 11585 June 11, 2015 at 6:41 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Is it possible to be "born again" without faith? naturestubbs1 11 4813 July 9, 2014 at 6:27 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  See if you can watch 30 seconds of this Video without facepalming OhWord 18 6001 May 31, 2014 at 11:53 am
Last Post: BlackSwordsman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)