Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 3, 2025, 2:42 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science without Religion is lame
#37
RE: Science without Religion is lame
Curious: how do you define spiritual?

[/quote]

I define spiritual in somewhat of the Native American sense, which is being in touch with the intangible like your emotions and your psyche. Therefore, someone does not need religion to be spiritual and being religious does not necessarily entail being spiritual. Most people define spiritual as somehow being synonymous with religion, so when most people say they are spiritual, they mean religious. As for the religious person themselves I can't comment on their rationality as I don't know them, but their beliefs definitely appear irrational to me. If being more well rounded means not basing my life on mythical fairy tales, then yes, I am.

[/quote]

I too enjoy studying Native American culture, as they speak much about the sprit amoug the truth warriors as my famliy tree is part native. Much of Religion is ancient spirituality and I do not find very few that impress me and make much sense for living for today. Being an artist, I find mystical metaphors and fairy tale make sense and give great enjoyment. Books Like Cat and the Hat or Wizard of Oz has more healthy meaning to me rather than the Bible. Snnoreeee zzzzzz

There are 1000s of good books out there too

(June 6, 2011 at 4:53 pm)eric209 Wrote: First of all argument from majority is a fallacy. A one point over 90% of the world thought it was flat. Did that make it true? The masses are free to ignorance as are you.

No proof of that

Calling people ignorance right off the bat, is that a healthy attitude for your personal growth or for our society growth?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 5, 2011 at 10:31 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 5, 2011 at 11:24 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 1:03 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 1:06 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by jordi - June 6, 2011 at 2:07 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 2:10 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by jordi - June 6, 2011 at 2:28 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 2:48 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 3:16 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 11:36 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by orogenicman - June 6, 2011 at 4:21 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Darth - June 6, 2011 at 4:26 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 5:01 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Gawdzilla - June 6, 2011 at 6:49 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 12:10 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 11:45 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by DeistPaladin - June 6, 2011 at 11:57 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Gawdzilla - June 6, 2011 at 12:17 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 12:24 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 11:59 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by LastPoet - June 6, 2011 at 1:26 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 2:04 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 6, 2011 at 2:19 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 2:29 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Gawdzilla - June 6, 2011 at 4:28 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 2:12 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 2:42 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 4:47 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 4:53 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 5:38 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Welsh cake - June 6, 2011 at 3:29 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 4:26 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 6, 2011 at 5:07 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 6, 2011 at 5:54 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 11:09 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 7, 2011 at 2:22 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Anomalocaris - June 7, 2011 at 3:42 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Anomalocaris - June 6, 2011 at 8:17 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 7, 2011 at 2:06 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 3:30 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 4:09 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 8, 2011 at 1:02 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 7, 2011 at 4:42 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 8, 2011 at 12:47 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 8, 2011 at 3:32 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by eric209 - June 9, 2011 at 1:14 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 7, 2011 at 11:04 pm
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 8, 2011 at 12:22 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 8, 2011 at 1:14 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 8, 2011 at 1:38 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Violet - June 8, 2011 at 5:19 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Darth - June 8, 2011 at 5:58 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Jax - June 8, 2011 at 6:59 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 9, 2011 at 4:24 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 8, 2011 at 8:53 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by tackattack - June 9, 2011 at 1:03 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by tackattack - June 9, 2011 at 5:17 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 9, 2011 at 6:09 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by tackattack - June 9, 2011 at 6:50 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Epimethean - June 9, 2011 at 10:37 am
RE: Science without Religion is lame - by Castle - June 9, 2011 at 2:09 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? Whateverist 143 53693 March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Without the Shedding of Blood There is No Remission of Sin Rhondazvous 231 73152 June 4, 2017 at 9:31 am
Last Post: Zenith
  Little children who died without Baptism go to eternal Hell?! Jehanne 34 7813 February 29, 2016 at 6:22 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Why i choose science reason and atheism over religion dyresand 28 9094 December 29, 2015 at 5:43 pm
Last Post: dyresand
Exclamation Without God You will Fail! Gods Squad 110 21698 October 19, 2015 at 9:28 am
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  How to prove Christianity is right without trying very hard Dystopia 6 4198 July 15, 2015 at 5:01 am
Last Post: Excited Penguin
  How to Prove Your Own Position without Trying Very Hard Randy Carson 59 14119 July 14, 2015 at 10:27 pm
Last Post: Ravenshire
  Bad/Good Things That Happen Without the Aid of a Deity Nope 30 11624 June 11, 2015 at 6:41 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Is it possible to be "born again" without faith? naturestubbs1 11 4842 July 9, 2014 at 6:27 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  See if you can watch 30 seconds of this Video without facepalming OhWord 18 6077 May 31, 2014 at 11:53 am
Last Post: BlackSwordsman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)