(November 3, 2016 at 7:16 am)Mathilda Wrote:(November 2, 2016 at 11:03 am)Drich Wrote: What makes you think being so close to the action, it hasn't tainted your view?
Ah yes of course. Let's leave it up to people with no expertise, experience or knowledge of a field to be the ones to judge it because they're untainted.
That makes perfect sense.
In fact, why not just have the world run by children. They're less tainted than anybody!
Do we allow normal police officers to 'police' themselves?
Why not?
For all the same reason you just mentioned wouldn't it make more sense for them to be the perfect canidate?
OR is the possiblity of corruption too great?
Now what makes you think the world of 'science' is any different?
In truth, those who do police the police are not saddled with the same duties or burdens. Alot of the time they come from 'other' discipline in the police department so to be more objective. They can even as outside of law enforcement all together.
Again you all seem to be confusing me judging content, rather than the context of the situation. I personally do not give two squirts about the H/B or what Cern thinks. I am looking at how they packaged their data and how they sold a product that was used to fool the scientific community
