RE: On Logic and Alternate Universes
November 6, 2016 at 11:58 am
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2016 at 11:59 am by Edwardo Piet.)
"2+2=5" means four things is equal to five things or something that is not something else is equal to that very something else that it is not or A=not A. It's violation in identity. If when you say "2+2=5" two doesn't mean two plus doesn't mean plus and five doesn't mean five then you may as well have said "sakgsngsakgjasigasji" to which my answer is "isagasigasjgiajsiajgia".
It's not even a successful hypothetical or premise.
"Imagine a hypothetical universe that is not itself because the law of identity doesn't apply" Doesn't actually mean anything. It's not even a premise. You can't have "A= not A" as a premise.
It's not even a successful hypothetical or premise.
"Imagine a hypothetical universe that is not itself because the law of identity doesn't apply" Doesn't actually mean anything. It's not even a premise. You can't have "A= not A" as a premise.