Premise 1: Hypotheticals have to be hypotheticals.
Premise 2. "Hypotheticals have to be hypotheticals" is an expression of the law of identity: A=A.
Conclusion: All hypotheticals presuppose the law of identity.
You can't have an "if X then Y" without presupposing that "if"="if" "then"="then" and "Y"="Y".
You can't have a hypothetical universe with other logical laws that don't have other logical laws. You can't have a hypothetical universe where A=A is false.
You can't describe anything or hypothesize anything without describing and hypothesizing. Without A=A.
If you say "In hypothetical universe X the law of identity doesn't apply" you're implicitly saying "Hypothetical universe X has the identity of not having an identity". That doesn't work.
There is no description without an identity. Descriptions have to be descriptions and that which describes something has to describe something. All descriptions and hypotheticals presuppose that A=A.
Premise 2. "Hypotheticals have to be hypotheticals" is an expression of the law of identity: A=A.
Conclusion: All hypotheticals presuppose the law of identity.
You can't have an "if X then Y" without presupposing that "if"="if" "then"="then" and "Y"="Y".
You can't have a hypothetical universe with other logical laws that don't have other logical laws. You can't have a hypothetical universe where A=A is false.
You can't describe anything or hypothesize anything without describing and hypothesizing. Without A=A.
If you say "In hypothetical universe X the law of identity doesn't apply" you're implicitly saying "Hypothetical universe X has the identity of not having an identity". That doesn't work.
There is no description without an identity. Descriptions have to be descriptions and that which describes something has to describe something. All descriptions and hypotheticals presuppose that A=A.
