(November 6, 2016 at 2:18 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: You can't have a hypothetical without implying the truth of the law of identity. "if X then Y" has to mean "If X then Y".
You can't define your way out of a law that is already implied when you try to define your way out of it.
No shit, Sherlock. You won't shut up long enough about that - which everyone agrees on - in order to see the what people are actually talking about. Nor would you let go of that goddamn bone long enough for me to get to the second leg of the point I was trying to make.
You aren't listening. Ergo, it's pointless to attempt to communicate with you. So I'm done.
Enjoy arguing with yourself.
