On Logic and Alternate Universes

[Edwardo Piet]

"Yes you do"
No, I don't
"Yes you do"
No, I don't'

Boring, Ham, boring, and...like all of this bullshit about identity, irrelevant.  

The way I see it is: you don't get the relevance.

I've -been- describing it.  Deny reality as it hits you in your stubborn face...

So I persistently disagree and I get told I'm stubborn and denying reality. I could say exactly the same about those who stubbornly disagee with me. It's just like those cunts who try to have the last word with me by telling me that I'm trying to have the last word with them. Tired of such hipocrisy.

I can say the same thing to you, you'er stubborn and denying reality.

You haven't been describing it, you think you have because you fail to see the relevance of A=A. You can't describe a hypothetical without describing it and you're like "duh" but completely ignore the conclusion that "therefore you can't have a hypothetical that is not itself therefore A=A therefore the law of identity applies in the hypotehtical[/quote]

but when you're done with that, maybe answer or even approach the question repeatedly asked?

I've already answered it repeatedly. It's a nonsensical question based on a nonsensical premise. It can't be answered. I'm more interested in discussing why you fail to realize that and why you insist on telling me to answer a nonsense question. Next you'll be telling me "Why is there something rather than nothing?" isn't a nonsensical question either.