RE: On Logic and Alternate Universes
November 6, 2016 at 8:55 pm
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2016 at 8:58 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
You think it's not an issue of labelling but it is.
The OP is trying and failing to hypothesize the unhypothesizable. You can't imagine something unimaginable. You can't have a tautology or a defintiion without A=A or 2+2=4. These are absolute laws that transcend alternative universes or hypotheticals, this is about reality as a whole, both possible and actual, both real and imagined, both hypothetical and non-hypothetical, both imaginable and unimaginable, both supposed and non-supposed, both conceptualizated and non-conceptualized. I'm not talking about the concepts of mathematics or logic, i'm talking about the logical and mathematical absolutes. That A = A or 1 = 1 or 2+2 = 2+2/2+2 = 4
The OP is trying and failing to hypothesize the unhypothesizable. You can't imagine something unimaginable. You can't have a tautology or a defintiion without A=A or 2+2=4. These are absolute laws that transcend alternative universes or hypotheticals, this is about reality as a whole, both possible and actual, both real and imagined, both hypothetical and non-hypothetical, both imaginable and unimaginable, both supposed and non-supposed, both conceptualizated and non-conceptualized. I'm not talking about the concepts of mathematics or logic, i'm talking about the logical and mathematical absolutes. That A = A or 1 = 1 or 2+2 = 2+2/2+2 = 4
