To claim that it's 100% nature or 100% choice are both fallicious as there's evidence for both. Claiming it's all one or the other is in denial of evidence. Sexual behavior is not the same as sexual orientation. I feel that orientation is majorly (almost entirely) genetic, while behavior is the same ratio of nature/nurture to which the dominant orientation is nurtured and the strength if it's genetic dominance. Behavior almost by defaul assumes a choice in every incidence I can think of. To say homosexual behavior isn't a choice I would say is fallicious. Sexual Orientation, based on genetics, I'll conceed is far enough into the nature realm as too fundamental to who we are as individuals to be a choice.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
