RE: On Logic and Alternate Universes
November 11, 2016 at 4:57 pm
(This post was last modified: November 11, 2016 at 4:58 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(November 8, 2016 at 1:14 am)Irrational Wrote:(November 7, 2016 at 6:42 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Hehe. But do you absolutely refuse to think in absolutes? [emoji6]
I get what you're saying. Logically speaking, I am being nonsensical and contradicting myself.
"Illogical sense" is a oxymoron and "logical sense" is a tautology. Unless you're wanting to equivocate... in which case you're not making a successful argument.
"I'm contradicting myself and being nonsensical logically speaking." just means "I'm contradicting myself and being nonsensical."
@ Rhythm
Like I said repeatedly throughout this thread... you can't have 2+2=5.
@ FallenToReason
Not my problem. The fact you fail to create a premise with alternative logical rules that are logically possible is not my problem.
As me and Gemini were discussing recently: it's pretty basic modal logic that you can't have an alternative universe than violates the LOI and basic mathematics like "2+2=4" which is based upon it. And, like she said, the whole thing about "an extra thing popping into existence" in this 'alternative universe' is so very confused. That's got absolutely nothing to do with logic.
