(November 13, 2016 at 4:15 pm)pocaracas Wrote:[*](November 13, 2016 at 4:13 pm)Edward John Wrote: [*][*]
All radiometric dating methods are based on assumptions about events that happened in the past. If the assumptions are accepted as true (as is typically done in the evolutionary dating processes), results can be biased toward a desired age. In the reported ages given in textbooks and other journals, these evolutionary assumptions have not been questioned, while results inconsistent with long ages have been censored. Therefore completely useless.
Guys, I see we've found an expert!
Do tell us, poor ignorant idiot atheists: what are those assumptions and why are they false, again?
Maybe you should start by telling us how those methods are supposed to work...?
Also, how did you arrive at thousands of years?
Wait few more days after I am done with the 30/30 rule and I'll post the video.
YouTube video Called"Evolution VS Creation | Evolution a Myth Part 3/12"
