(June 11, 2011 at 12:50 am)5thHorseman Wrote: No I wouldn't let people suffer, I would agree with circumvision on medical grounds, but just for tradition is disgusting.
Oh, alright. Perhaps I got the wrong assumption because of the way you worded your posts.
Quote:Surely genital mutilation is a change to the sexual organ. So I think I am correct in circumcision being genital mutilation. If I'm wrong I apologise. But how you can say 'it's just extra skin' is a bit silly.
Alright, I admit, I was stupid for saying "extra skin". But still, circumcision can also bring benefits, as well as non-circumcision.