Eg "You must be religious to join ______"
xXUKAFTTXx
Poll: Allow freedom to join orgnanisations which ban atheists This poll is closed. |
|||
Yes | 2 | 50.00% | |
No | 2 | 50.00% | |
Total | 4 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Ban all discrimination towards athiests
|
Eg "You must be religious to join ______"
xXUKAFTTXx
No man. Teach society. Don't force society.
Privatly funded organisations can set their standards however they want.
Only by publicly funded organisations should equality be obliged to follow standards which give equal rights to everyone. RE: Ban all discrimination towards athiests
March 3, 2013 at 3:57 pm
(This post was last modified: March 3, 2013 at 3:59 pm by xXUKAtheistForTheTruthXx.)
(March 3, 2013 at 3:54 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: No man. Teach society. Don't force society. Sadly, there is some ignorant assholes which you can't teach AT ALL (March 3, 2013 at 3:57 pm)The Germans are coming Wrote: Privatly funded organisations can set their standards however they want. I kinda agree with that as long it is organisations which we REALLY wouldn't join, like "Westboro Baptist Church", "Mormons", hate groups and all extremist religious organisations
xXUKAFTTXx
Basically what Germans said. Public institutions have a responsibility to be open to every member of society (since they are supported by every member of society). Private institutions do not have that responsibility.
(March 3, 2013 at 4:06 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Basically what Germans said. Public institutions have a responsibility to be open to every member of society (since they are supported by every member of society). Private institutions do not have that responsibility. Your like 99.8% right on that Private institutions shouldnt be able to abuse that and defame atheists though
xXUKAFTTXx
Why not? It's free speech.
(March 3, 2013 at 4:17 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Why not? It's free speech. Sometimes that is used to violate anti-hate law and anti-slander
xXUKAFTTXx
I don't believe anti-hate laws should even exist. Non-discrimination by the public sector should be the limit. Any other laws violate freedoms of people who hold views and beliefs. There should be no law broken when a racist remarks that they hate all black people, but there should be laws against actions based on those remarks or beliefs. Inciting people to hatred and inciting people to act on hatred are entirely different things.
(March 3, 2013 at 4:23 pm)Tiberius Wrote: I don't believe anti-hate laws should even exist. Non-discrimination by the public sector should be the limit. Any other laws violate freedoms of people who hold views and beliefs. There should be no law broken when a racist remarks that they hate all black people, but there should be laws against actions based on those remarks or beliefs. Inciting people to hatred and inciting people to act on hatred are entirely different things. Agreed
xXUKAFTTXx
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|