RE: How Much Evidence Will It Take You To Believe In God???
November 15, 2016 at 3:23 pm
(This post was last modified: November 15, 2016 at 3:30 pm by Edward John.)
(November 15, 2016 at 2:12 pm)Mathilda Wrote:(November 15, 2016 at 1:52 pm)Edward John Wrote: The big bang still needs a cause, case unresolved.
All causes are merely a re-arrangement of matter and energy. The Big Bang is all space-time and energy in one particular condensed state.
Sure, feel free to say that your god put it in that state if it makes you happy, but it makes your god utterly irrelevant if that's all he did. Because we can explain most of what happened after the Big Bang. And your explanation of goddidit has no explanatory power and is not useful in the slightest. How did he do it? How did your god come about?
Saying goddidit is just a way of avoiding asking questions.
I certainly hope you're not expecting me to take your answer seriously.
(November 15, 2016 at 3:06 pm)Stimbo Wrote:(November 15, 2016 at 1:08 pm)Edward John Wrote: Well, You tell us that there is "absolutely no evidence of any supernatural intervention" in the universe. Really? How do you know that? Have you examined all evidence in all places?
I have.
Really, have you looked at all the alleged proofs that exist in order to then state that there is no proof for God's existence?
(November 15, 2016 at 3:17 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:Quit with the humility problem talk, I am trying to save your soul remember?Edward John Wrote:I am not full of wisdom only God is. But Thanks.
You mouth humble words without displaying any actual humility. Like the realization that you might not know us better than we know ourselves, or that it's possible that your 'proof' contains flaws...it's almost like you think you're perfect and incapable of error...but you SAY only God is full of wisdom, and it's mouthing the right words that's important, right?