RE: Were social justice warriors responsible for the election outcome?
November 16, 2016 at 1:17 am
(November 15, 2016 at 9:53 am)TaraJo Wrote: I can't help but look at the election results and think, in hindsight, I can't be too surprised.
Since about 2012 or so, the SJW's have been on the rise; the jerks who use progressive sounding, virtuous buzzwords to justify being jerks. Before, they were always on the fringe for everyone to laugh at their absurdity. You can go to Tumblr and find them all over the place and they're increasingly getting more influential on twitter. But lately, they've been getting more noticed, especially on college campuses.
It feels like suicide for the democrats and even for the reasonable republicans. I mean, seriously: white people, like it or not, are the majority here, but in this election cycle, these people turned "white male" into an insult in the name of progressivism. I don't know how they think a democracy works, but you don't win elections by insulting the majority. Not to mention, there's the boy-who-cried-wolf effect: we've gotten so used to bratty college kids calling everything racism that when Trump is saying or doing things that are genuinely racist, we ignore it. Racism is a term that's so over-used that it lost its meaning, opening the doors for legitimate, serious racism.
And the kicker? Hillary focused on them but ignored the rust belt states that used to be the backbone of the democratic party. Yeah, the middle class factory workers in Ohio, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. Their jobs are suddenly being outsourced to Asian sweatshops and they aren't exactly trained to work the jobs that are replacing them. Yet, instead of talking about those issues, progressives are dismissing them because they're "white males." Instead of listening to their concerns, their worries, their issues, they're being chastised for not memorizing a 19-year-old's ten sylable gender identity that he just came up with last week. Trump, to his credit, actually showed concern for them, claiming he'll back out of Nafta and bring manufacturing back from China (I don't think he'll actually be able to do either, but at least he's showing concern). You want to flip this election around, have Hillary address labor issues, manufacturing jobs, things like that, and don't just cater to a bunch of spoiled college kids.
^Exactly what I've tried to say on here.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh