Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Wtf is it with all the theists using big bold fonts nowadays?



Demonstrate that evolution is not testable, repeatable, observable or falsifiable.

We can test for it by cross breeding animals, which has been done for centuries with cattle, chickens, foxes and dogs for example. This can be repeated. It has been observed both in nature and with genetic algorithms. It is falsifiable in that you could demonstrate that what we are observing works by means other than inherited traits, mutation of genetic information and natural selection.

Cross breading is not evolution it is still within the same kind, Another thing is you can't cross bread two kinds of animals so you can't breed a fox and donkey for example. There might be different types of dogs but they are still dogs that is not evolution that is just variation within a kind. The species on earth today descend from the original created kinds of Genesis 1. The many inter-species breedings that are possible today (e.g., zonkeys, wholphins), as well as the close similarities within biological groups (e.g., the canine group) that are distinct from one another, remind us of this fact. 

It is not my job to demonstrate that evolution is not testable, repeatable, observable or falsifiable because my position is the negative position. It is your job to Demonstrate that evolution is testable, repeatable, observable or falsifiable.

---

I was going to point this out and suggest that it be moved to the proper section of the forum, but then I decided that I just don't care enough about this troll's threads. He's just going to make 10 more tomorrow.

It depends on what you mean by "troll", the word troll is highly subjective in this forum. I usually am encountered with the word troll, whenever an atheist cannot stand up to my irrefutable facts, they use it to run away from me like your doing.

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and posts through feathers, it's a duck.