Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 3, 2025, 2:32 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
#52
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 22, 2016 at 9:33 am)robvalue Wrote: Even if the theory of evolution was proved completely wrong tomorrow, so what? What is the end game?

Scientists reconsider and start building a new hypothesis, or more likely adapting the old one.

What does not happen is scientists all say "Well God did it then". It's a pointless argument from ignorance.

And for 10 bonus points, if "God did it", I don't give a s*** anyway. Good for him. So what? 

"And for 10 bonus points, if "God did it", I don't give a s*** anyway. Good for him. So what?"

This information was the most important one I ever received from youThank You for your honesty, “The Creator is clearly seen,” Paul explained to the Romans 1:20. Yet despite all their intelligence and scientific skills, the Gentiles refused to acknowledge the Creator. The problem was not their inability to see Him but their rebellious hearts, which “suppressed the truth in unrighteousness” Romans 1:18. Scripture makes it clear that God’s eternal power and divine nature are clearly seen in the creation of the world around us. God is saying that the design and complexity of nature makes it obvious that He exists. But hard hearts often refuse to accept any evidence that the Bible is true, for it makes them accountable to a Creator God.

Another problem you have is epistemological and philosophical.  How does one know anything?  What is the source of knowledge and certainty?  You need check up on biblical epistemology. Also refer back to page 1 of ☢The Theistic Response➼ to Atheists saying, "It Doesn't mean God Did it".
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔ - by The Joker - November 22, 2016 at 1:31 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 11585 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Silver
  Why did Communists promote Evolution? Nishant Xavier 318 26802 September 7, 2023 at 5:48 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not? Nishant Xavier 91 7572 August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The fascinating asymmetry of theist-atheist discussion Astreja 5 665 July 22, 2023 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  I'm no longer an anti-theist Duty 27 2993 September 16, 2022 at 1:08 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  I received a letter from a theist, need a good reply Radamand 22 2753 March 22, 2022 at 10:56 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Why do theist often drop the letter s when referring to atheists? I_am_not_mafia 56 14400 August 23, 2018 at 4:20 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
Tongue Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic Cecelia 983 188883 June 6, 2018 at 2:11 pm
Last Post: Raven Orlock
  Why was Newton a theist? Alexmahone 65 15105 March 24, 2018 at 12:39 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Why America is anti-theist. Goosebump 3 1279 March 1, 2018 at 9:06 am
Last Post: mlmooney89



Users browsing this thread: 23 Guest(s)