RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 22, 2016 at 4:35 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2016 at 4:37 pm by The Joker.)
(November 22, 2016 at 3:38 pm)Stimbo Wrote:(November 22, 2016 at 2:26 pm)The Joker Wrote: A kind means the same type of healthy animal that can procreate, in other words it isn't Cat+Dog or horse + cow but rather Cow+Cow, Dog+Dog They are all the same kind.
Here is a diagram showing the relationship between all the different classifications used by modern taxonomists. You may google any words of two or more syllables. Where does 'kind' and/or 'type' fit into this system?
Good for bringing this up, Carl Linnaeus a Creationist was the founder of the modern classification system. in the 1700s the image that you brought up was carl Linnaeus taxonomy. Secular scientists have added several new categories in light of their ancestral “tree-based” taxonomy, but use the old system for convenience. It is now:
- Domain
- Kingdom
- Phylum
- Subphylum
- Class
- Cohort
- Order
- Suborder
- Infraorder
- Superfamily
- Family
- Genus
- Species
Creationist Classification of the mourning dove:
- Class 1: Day Five
- Class 2: Winged/Air
- Class 3: Winged/Flying creatures (owph)
- Class 4: Bird
- Class 5: Living
- Kind: Dove kind (yownah)
- Sub-kind 1: dove
- Sub-kind 2: mourning dove
- Others within the kind: passenger pigeon (now extinct), turtle dove, fantails, pouters, Jacobins, tumblers, homing pigeons, carrier pigeons
(November 22, 2016 at 4:25 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:It depends on what you mean.(November 22, 2016 at 1:13 pm)The Joker Wrote: I gave you examples of the theory of evolution is testable, repeatable, observable and falsifiable.
If that is the case then I would have been convinced by your examples but I am not, why am I not convinced yet?
Because you're a fucking ignorant idiot?