Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 18, 2025, 1:15 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
#81
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 22, 2016 at 4:26 pm)Stimbo Wrote:
(November 22, 2016 at 4:02 pm)Whateverist Wrote: I think he means that a man might lie with a man or a woman with a woman, but never would these different kinds do anything so unholy as to lie together, and regardless no offspring could come of it.

That's the thing. The damnbible talks about animal being made "after their kind" etc, but it also says that bats are birds and the Moon is a light. Once we start to strip out everything we know to be wrong, how do we know where to stop?

The Bible is not meant to be a scientific description of modern biological categories. Instead, it is often written from the perspective of what we see. In other words, it makes generic categorizations. In this case, the bat is categorized as a bird because like birds, it flies and is similar in size to most birds. If we did not know that it was a mammal, it would be natural to call it a bird. To the Hebrew of ancient times, calling it a bird was perfectly logical.

(November 22, 2016 at 4:43 pm)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: Are you some kind of imbecile?
 Define "Imbecile" then Define that then Define that, then where did it come from?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔ - by The Joker - November 22, 2016 at 4:45 pm
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔ - by deleteduser12345 - November 23, 2016 at 10:47 am
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔ - by deleteduser12345 - November 25, 2016 at 8:07 am
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔ - by deleteduser12345 - November 25, 2016 at 8:54 am
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔ - by deleteduser12345 - November 25, 2016 at 8:34 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 14721 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Silver
  Why did Communists promote Evolution? Nishant Xavier 318 36992 September 7, 2023 at 5:48 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not? Nishant Xavier 91 10163 August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The fascinating asymmetry of theist-atheist discussion Astreja 5 925 July 22, 2023 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  I'm no longer an anti-theist Duty 27 3501 September 16, 2022 at 1:08 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  I received a letter from a theist, need a good reply Radamand 22 3340 March 22, 2022 at 10:56 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Why do theist often drop the letter s when referring to atheists? I_am_not_mafia 56 16177 August 23, 2018 at 4:20 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
Tongue Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic Cecelia 983 223721 June 6, 2018 at 2:11 pm
Last Post: Raven Orlock
  Why was Newton a theist? Alexmahone 65 16768 March 24, 2018 at 12:39 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Why America is anti-theist. Goosebump 3 1389 March 1, 2018 at 9:06 am
Last Post: mlmooney89



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)