Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 23, 2024, 12:25 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
#92
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 22, 2016 at 5:44 pm)Stimbo Wrote:
(November 22, 2016 at 5:29 pm)The Joker Wrote: I'd say Family.

Great. Now we have a working definition. That would mean that, for example, dogs are the same 'kind' as coyotes, foxes and jackals; cats the same 'kind' as lions, tigers and leopards; horses the same 'kind' as zebras and donkeys; and humans are the same 'kind' as gorillas, orangutans, chimpanzees and bonobos.

So they should all be able to interbreed, yes?

I as a creationist would agree to the point of the following.

Great. Now we have a working definition. That would mean that, for example, dogs are the same 'kind' as coyotes, foxes and jackals; cats the same 'kind' as lions, tigers and leopards; horses the same 'kind' as zebras and donkeys;

They are correct.

 and humans are the same 'kind' as gorillas, orangutans, chimpanzees and bonobos.

But this I see no connection, Humans are far above them all, we are in the image of God, While unique in their own way, both humans and animals can have such features as eyes, noses, legs, and arms that point to our common Creator. It is the unique creation of mankind in the image of God that distinguishes us from all other creatures. This still-common idea is not in the slightest a proof of evolution. It is simply an assumption by those who reject creation. So what about the classifications? Well, Creationists gave Humans their very own classification.
  • Class 1: Day six
  • Class 2: Ground 
  • Class 3: Image of God creature 
  • Class 4: Human
  • Class 5: Living
  • Kind: Man
  • Sub-kind 1: Mankind
  • Sub-kind 2: Man
  • Kingdom- Sons of God
  • Phylum- The Image of God
  • Class-Eternal Creature
  • Order-Mankind
  • Family -Human
  • Genus -Man
  • Species -Man
The Scientific Objections:
  • The human brain possesses qualities  that have no parallel in the animal world. One consequence is man’s explicit mental capabilities.
  • Man possesses the faculty of speech, and his creative communication by means of his vocal system is completely different from those of animals. He has the unique ability to pay attention to various matters at will; he has an inconceivably wide range of interests and observation, because it is possible to consider spatially and temporally remote objects; he is able to make abstractions and to use his system of signs for meta-lingual purposes.
  • Only man is fully bipedal; he can walk upright because of the special structure of the spine. Thus, our hands are not required for locomotion and are available for other purposes.
  • Only man is able to express emotions (e.g., joy, sadness, hope, laughter, shyness). Some animals seem to have similar abilities, but they cannot be compared with human emotions.
So they should all be able to interbreed, yes?

The rest of the animals may, but humans shall not interbreed with other animals for this would be a sin of Bestiality and damnation in Hell.

(November 22, 2016 at 5:51 pm)Stimbo Wrote:
(November 22, 2016 at 5:47 pm)The Joker Wrote: The Bible teaches a literal  6 day creation and because a day and kinds are not the same thing, Kinds are Gods classification of animals he created and I do not follow Secular modernist evolutionists. I look at everything from the biblical perspective.

Translation:

"No, the book MUST be right! It's reality that's wrong!"

But I see it the other way around.

Translation:

"No, man MUST be right! It's(Bible) reality that's right!"

Administrator Notice
Material plagiarised from https://answersingenesis.org/are-humans-...life-ob16/. If you're going to parrot Ken Ham, at least have the decency to cite the source.
-Stimbo
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔ - by The Joker - November 22, 2016 at 6:26 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 7474 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Foxaèr
  Why did Communists promote Evolution? Nishant Xavier 318 17096 September 7, 2023 at 5:48 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not? Nishant Xavier 91 5275 August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The fascinating asymmetry of theist-atheist discussion Astreja 5 482 July 22, 2023 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  I'm no longer an anti-theist Duty 27 2084 September 16, 2022 at 1:08 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  I received a letter from a theist, need a good reply Radamand 22 2076 March 22, 2022 at 10:56 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Why do theist often drop the letter s when referring to atheists? I_am_not_mafia 56 12230 August 23, 2018 at 4:20 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
Tongue Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic Cecelia 983 155189 June 6, 2018 at 2:11 pm
Last Post: Raven Orlock
  Why was Newton a theist? Alexmahone 65 13158 March 24, 2018 at 12:39 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Why America is anti-theist. Goosebump 3 1137 March 1, 2018 at 9:06 am
Last Post: mlmooney89



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)