RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 23, 2016 at 8:45 am
(This post was last modified: November 23, 2016 at 8:46 am by The Joker.)
(November 23, 2016 at 8:40 am)Mathilda Wrote:(November 23, 2016 at 8:34 am)The Joker Wrote: All dating methods use dating assumptions(A belief) so non of them are correct.
You are saying that if you have a belief in it then it is incorrect.
You believe in God and make an assumption that he exists. Using your logic that must mean that he doesn't exist.
In religion I use a different term I have faith in God. But also with God there are absolute proves that he exists.
What I am saying is that you could have belief that the earth is 4 billion years old but don't call it a fact.
(November 23, 2016 at 8:44 am)Mathilda Wrote:(November 23, 2016 at 8:39 am)The Joker Wrote: I can't copy them here, I can't link them 30/30 rule, neither can I explain them from the top of head. Google it. So dating assumptions proves no age.
Google scholar brings up a load of peer reviewed scientific papers which suggests that the dating methods are largely correct. Which means that you are wrong.
Then its falsely shown.
