RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 23, 2016 at 10:53 am
(This post was last modified: November 23, 2016 at 10:55 am by Crossless2.0.)
The Joker wrote (joked?):
The Various Tests prove a young earth of 6000yrs, Creationist Science Ken Ham.
Wow. You truly are a moron if you think Ken Ham is a good source for understanding science. Ham would fuck up a baking soda volcano. Try reading a few good books for a change. Learn something!
The Various Tests prove a young earth of 6000yrs, Creationist Science Ken Ham.
- Carbon-14 in Fossils and Diamonds
- Carbon-14 Evidence for a Recent Global Flood and a Young Earth
- Measurable 14C in Fossilized Organic Materials: Confirming the Young Earth Creation-Flood Model
- “The Pitfalls in the Radioactive Dating Methods—The Radiocarbon Dating Method
- The Earth’s Magnetic Field Is Young
- The Earth’s Magnetic Field and the Age of the Earth
- “The Earth’s Magnetic Field” from Earth’s Catastrophic Past
- Helium Diffusion Rates Support Accelerated Nuclear Decay
- Young Helium Diffusion Age of Zircons Supports Accelerated Nuclear Decay
- The Age of the Earth’s Atmosphere Estimated by its Helium Content
- “Helium in Rocks and in the Atmosphere”
- DNA in “Ancient” Bacteria
Wow. You truly are a moron if you think Ken Ham is a good source for understanding science. Ham would fuck up a baking soda volcano. Try reading a few good books for a change. Learn something!