RE: Atheists, tell me, a Roman Catholic: why should I become an atheist?
November 24, 2016 at 3:03 pm
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2016 at 3:03 pm by The Joker.)
(November 24, 2016 at 2:47 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I even took the trouble to unpack all the in-quote responses. Please don't do that again.
(November 24, 2016 at 2:34 pm)The Joker Wrote: (Argument is flawed there are no pink elephants, haven't seen a real pink elephant on media, zoo.)
Irrelevant - argument from ignorance is not a refutation.
(November 24, 2016 at 2:34 pm)The Joker Wrote: (Argument is flawed as we don't know what that "something" and therefore how can we do it?)
Irrelevant - argument from ignorance is not a refutation.
(November 24, 2016 at 2:34 pm)The Joker Wrote: (True)
(Act what? And how not existing?)
Irrelevant - argument from ignorance is not a refutation.
(November 24, 2016 at 2:34 pm)The Joker Wrote: (Argument is flawed, therefore God does exist.)
Non-sequitur; and no valid objection raised to the argument, therefore argumemt not shown to be flawed, therefore still stands.
(November 24, 2016 at 2:34 pm)The Joker Wrote: (True, but logic can)
Great; you're starting to get it.
If you want to know whether Christianity is true, research it yourself. You seem intelligent, well not this obviously, as it is only arguments from ignorance. I'm sure you could find evidence on your own, most everyone else who studies history did.